Sektzia Nes Tziona vs Maccabi Netanya Timeline
The Teams Sektzia Nes Tziona vs Maccabi Netanya timeline has played 5 Games up to today. Among them, Sektzia Nes Tziona won 2 games ( 2 at home, 0 at away), Maccabi Netanya won 2 ( 0 at home, 2 at away), and Sektzia Nes Tziona draw 1 (1 at home, 0 at away).
Sektzia Nes Tziona has scored 0.6 goals on average in each game. On the other side, Maccabi Netanya has scored 1.4 goals on average in each game.
H2H Record
| Ligat ha'Al | |
|---|---|
| Maccabi Netanya | 2 |
| Draw | 1 |
| Sektzia Nes Tziona | 2 |
| Total | 5 |
Sektzia Nes Tziona vs Maccabi Netanya Head to head Statistics
Sektzia Nes Tziona Form
Bnei Sakhnin
Sektzia Nes Tziona
Beitar Jerusalem
Sektzia Nes Tziona
Maccabi Bnei Raina
Maccabi Netanya Form
Maccabi Netanya
Beitar Jerusalem
Hapoel Hadera
Maccabi Netanya
Hapoel Haifa
Head to head Timeline
Ligat ha'Al - H2H
SEK
About the Sektzia Nes Tziona vs Maccabi Netanya Timeline
In the Israel Ligat ha'Al, the two teams played a total of 5 games before, of which Sektzia Nes Tziona won 2, Maccabi Netanya won 2 and the two teams draw 1.
You have arrived at the page where you may compare the teams Sektzia Nes Tziona versus Maccabi Netanya timeline before the game begins. Statistics for both teams can be easily compared here.
Under/Over Statistics, Predictions
So far, the combined matches of Sektzia Nes Tziona and Maccabi Netanya have ended 3 times with 2 goals or less and 2 times with more than 2 goals.On the home soil, Sektzia Nes Tziona participated in 3 matches that ended with the teams scoring 2 goals or less in total (UNDER 2.5 - 100.0%).
When playing away from home, Maccabi Netanya took part to 2 matches that ended with the teams scoring more than 2 goals in total (OVER 2.5 - 100.0%).
Who is better Sektzia Nes Tziona vs Maccabi Netanya FC?
Last 5 matches, Sektzia Nes Tziona scored a total of 3 goals and won 2 games (40%) and Maccabi Netanya scored a total of 7 goals and won 2 games (40%). 20% was draw.
This page contains information about a team's detailed from 2005.
